RPPS AS AN EXPRESSION OF STATE CAPACITY AND PATH DEPENDENCE IN BRAZILIAN FEDERALISM
Main Article Content
Abstract
This essay proposes an analytical shift in the study of Brazilian Public Sector Pension Schemes (RPPS), moving the focus away from actuarial and normative aspects toward an institutional perspective grounded in public policy analysis. It argues that RPPS should be understood as institutions that express central dimensions of state organization at the subnational level, particularly within federal contexts marked by unequal state capacities and path-dependent dynamics. The analysis articulates models of social protection, institutional arrangements, and financing methods to demonstrate that pension systems embody choices regarding the distribution of risks, responsibilities, and resources over time. It also examines the relationship between RPPS and public finances, highlighting their effects on resource allocation, intertemporal commitments, and fiscal sustainability. The study argues that the establishment of RPPS was frequently associated with greater local autonomy in pension management, generating short-term fiscal incentives and deferred costs over time, especially in light of the challenges involved in transitioning between financing methods. As a contribution, the essay repositions RPPS as an analytical lens for understanding the Brazilian state, showing that their outcomes reflect the interaction between state capacities, federal arrangements, and institutional trajectories in decentralized and unequal contexts.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The authors retain the copyright and grant the Brazilian Journal of Research in Applied Social Sciences the right of first publication, with the work published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon the material in any medium or format, as long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows commercial use.
How to Cite
References
ARRETCHE, Marta (Org.); RODRIGUEZ, Vicente. Descentralização das políticas sociais no Brasil. São Paulo: FUNDAP, 1999. 184 p. (Federalismo no Brasil). Co-edição FAPESP/IPEA.
BARR, Nicholas. Reforming pensions: myths, truths, and policy choices. London: London School of Economics and Political Science, 2005.
BARR, Nicholas; DIAMOND, Peter. Reforming pensions: principles and policy choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
CAETANO, Marcelo Abi-Ramia. Previdência social e distribuição de renda. Brasília: Ipea, 2016.
ESPING-ANDERSEN, Gøsta. As três economias políticas do welfare state. Lua Nova, São Paulo, n. 24, p. 85-116, set. 1991.
FILGUEIRA, Fernando. Welfare and democracy in Latin America: the development, crises and aftermath of universal, dual and exclusionary social states. Genebra: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, 2005.
FIORI, José Luís. Estado de bem-estar social: padrões e crises. Saúde Coletiva, Rio de Janeiro, v. 7, n. 2, p. 129-147, 1997.
GIAMBIAGI, Fabio; ALÉM, Ana Cláudia. Finanças públicas: teoria e prática no Brasil. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2011.
GOMIDE, Alexandre de Ávila; PIRES, Roberto Rocha C. Capacidades estatais e democracia: arranjos institucionais de políticas públicas. Brasília: Ipea, 2014.
HOLZMANN, Robert; HINZ, Richard. Old-age income support in the 21st century: an international perspective on pension systems and reform. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2005.
LEIRIA, Filipe Costa. A política previdenciária dos entes subnacionais: entre instituições e crenças. 2021. Tese (Doutorado em Políticas Públicas) – Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2021.
NOGUEIRA, Narlon Gutierre. O equilíbrio financeiro e atuarial dos RPPS: de princípio constitucional a política pública de Estado. Brasília: Ministério da Previdência Social, 2012.
NORTH, Douglass C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
NUNES, Edson de Oliveira. A gramática política do Brasil: clientelismo e insulamento burocrático. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 1997.
PIERSON, Paul. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, Cambridge, v. 94, n. 2, p. 251-267, 2000.
SKOCPOL, Theda. Bringing the state back in: strategies of analysis in current research. In: EVANS, Peter; RUESCHEMEYER, Dietrich; SKOCPOL, Theda (org.). Bringing the state back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. p. 3-43.
SOUZA, Celina. Federalismo, desenho constitucional e instituições federativas no Brasil pós-1988. Revista de Sociologia e Política, Curitiba, n. 24, p. 105-121, jun. 2005.
SOUZA, Celina; FONTANELLI, Flavio. Capacidade estatal e burocrática: sobre conceitos, dimensões e medidas. In: MELLO, Janine; RIBEIRO, Vanda Mendes; MOTTA, Gabriela; BONAMINO, Alice; CARVALHO, Cynthia Paes de (org.). Implementação de políticas e atuação de gestores públicos: experiências recentes das políticas de redução das desigualdades. Brasília: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (Ipea), 2020.